Birth pain is consistently among the most severe types of pain that a woman experiences during her life. Even a small prevalence of persistent pain after childbirth has important consequences for public health and a great social burden. The use of neuroaxial techniques such as combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) or epidural analgesia with puncture of the dura mater (DPE) may have advantages over standard EA. One of the methods for assessing the condition of the fetus and uteroplacental blood flow in childbirth is tissue oximetry, based on the principle of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Currently, there is insufficient data on the assessment of uteroplacental blood flow using near-infrared spectroscopy, and further study using this technology may make it possible to determine the advantages and disadvantages of various methods of labor anesthesia.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the uteroplacental blood flow by tissue oximetry, the effectiveness of pain relief and the effect on the condition of a woman in labor through the natural birth canal using EA, CSEA, and DPE
The objective was to evaluate the utero-placental blood flow using the method of tissue oximetry, the effectiveness of pain syndrome relief and the influence on the condition of the woman in labor through the natural childbirth when using epidural (EA), combined spinal-epidural (CSE) and dural puncture epidural anesthesia (DPE).
A prospective study involving 240 patients during emergency deliveries was conducted at the at the Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology Ministry of Health of Russia. Analgesia was carried out by EA (N=60), CSE (N=60) and DPE (N=60), the control group consisted of women with no pain relief (N=60). On 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 15, 25, 30, 60, 90 and 120th minutes, data from parainfrared spectroscopy (NIRS), pain from VAS, bloop pressure, respiratory rate, and oxygenation of the blood were assessed.
We have not seen NIRS decrease below 89% for either EA or CSE. All of methods (EA, CSE, DPE) provided effective, fast-onset and long-term anesthesia to the birth, manifested by statistically significant reduction of the severity of pain syndrome on VAS from 8 points to 1-3 points. The fastest analgesic effect was observed in the CSE group (1-3 min), then in the DPE group (3-10 min) and in the EA group (7-15 min). Reduction of pain severity was more significant in DPE (up to 1-2 points in VAS) compared to EA. The reduction of pain syndrome in CSE was more stable and lasting than in EA. The anesthesia methods used to have a high favorable safety profile, as blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate, as well as oximetry and oxygenation of the blood during the entire observation period were within normal values.
What will the audience take away from presentation?